Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 2 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 53 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |