Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 12 HP more power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Antara. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Opel Antara has
| |