Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2012

 
Mazda CX-5
2015 - 2017
Mazda CX-5
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 175 HP175 HP
Torque: 420 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda CX-5 2015 and Mazda CX-5 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mazda CX-5 2015 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2015 could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-5 2015 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1180 km on highway
760 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.54 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.67 m1.71 m
Mazda CX-5 2015 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2015 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 503 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres1620 litres
Mazda CX-5 2015 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2015 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means Mazda CX-5 2015 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1402`120
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 15 0009600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda CX-5 has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv