Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 15 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |