Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 20 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1603 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Ford Kuga quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |