Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mazda CX-5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |