Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Kia Sportage 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 and Kia Sportage have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-5 torque is 5 NM more than Kia Sportage. Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.0 | |
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Carens | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
Mazda CX-5 is 12 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | 564 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 161 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |