Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-7 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mazda CX-7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 69 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but higher. Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 846 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`987 kg | 2`099 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-7 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |