Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 1 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 1 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 86 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`987 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |