Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 1 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 1 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 86 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`058 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |