Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 494 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1608 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`143 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |