Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 494 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1608 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`143 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`611 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 532 kg | 810 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 52 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |