Mazda CX-5 2019 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 1 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1688 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 256 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`470 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |