Mazda CX-5 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2019 engine produces 100 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 210 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2019 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2019 could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2019 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2019 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1688 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2019 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2019 has 412 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 2019 (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2019 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`045 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2019 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2019, so Mazda CX-5 2019 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |