Mazda CX-5 2019 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 21 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1687 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 255 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`656 kg | 1`977 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 459 kg | 493 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |