Mazda CX-5 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 44 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1687 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 577 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |