Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 16 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |