Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 2017 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2012. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2017 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2017 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 2012 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2017 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2017 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 1`945 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`411 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 534 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2017, so Mazda CX-5 2017 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |