Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 15 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`020 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`557 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 573 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |