Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 165 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |