Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Audi Q5 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 84 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 157 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1510 litres | |
Mazda CX-5 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | |||
Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 24 400 | 26 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |