Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2018 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-5 2018 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2018 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2018 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2018 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2018 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2018 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2018 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2018 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2018 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2018, so Mazda CX-5 2018 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |