Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 65 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`635 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 645 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Tiguan, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |