Mazda CX-5 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2018 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-5 2018 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.7 | |
| Mazda CX-5 2018 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2018 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2018 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2018 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2018 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2018 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2018 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`045 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`488 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 557 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2018 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2018, so Mazda CX-5 2018 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |