Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-5 torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1608 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 375 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`124 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mazda CX-5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |