Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2015 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2015 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 2078 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 71 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 458 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`135 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |