Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 2017 engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2017 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2017 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2017 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2017 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`135 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2017, so Mazda CX-5 2017 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |