Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2017 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2017 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means Mazda CX-5 2017 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`135 kg | 2`058 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`602 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 456 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2017, so Mazda CX-5 2017 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |