Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 176 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 18 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2016 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2016 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1087 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 2078 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`053 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |