Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 196 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Mazda CX-5 engine produces 85 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1455 litres | |
Mazda CX-5 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 165 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 27 000 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |