Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-5 torque is 14 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 56 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 177 mm (7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 501 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1633 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |