Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-5) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Kadjar) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 39 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 64 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 1`994 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`559 kg | 1`547 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 466 kg | 447 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |