Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 4 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Mazda CX-5 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |