Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 94 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 169 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 67 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 963 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 486 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |