Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 45 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Discovery Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 167 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 167 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 963 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1651 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage space (by 486 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery Sport (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 2`550 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`559 kg | 1`904 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 466 kg | 646 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |