Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 85 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Discovery Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1698 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 2`660 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`559 kg | 1`796 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 466 kg | 864 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Discovery Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |