Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 245 HP less power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 354 NM less than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 11.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 291 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.97 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 23 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 397 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1563 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Defender. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`559 kg | 2`193 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 466 kg | 807 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 73 procentiem less than Land Rover Defender. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Defender is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Defender scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 57 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |