Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 95 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 69 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.6 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 616 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1795 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`025 kg | 2`245 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`559 kg | 1`634 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 466 kg | 611 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Hyundai Tucson. Therefore, Hyundai Tucson is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Tucson is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Tucson scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |