Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 59 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 142 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | 1`994 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |