Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 416 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 4 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 181 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 8 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 539 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1860 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | 2`315 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Tucson is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Tucson scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |