Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, but torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C5 Aircross, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |