Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 110 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 7.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.3 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Tiguan. On average, a Mazda CX-5 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Tiguan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`045 | ~ 2`174 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
| |