Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-5
2015 - 2017
Toyota RAV4
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 192 HP146 - 180 HP
Torque: 208 - 420 NM187 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 10.2 seconds8.3 - 11.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.35.0 - 8.6
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 210 mm (8.3 inches)155 - 177 mm (6.1 - 7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.61 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.68 m1.70 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 503 litres1087 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1620 litres2078 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-5 has 584 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 458 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 metersno data
Gross weight: ~ 2`059 kg~ 2`128 kg
Net weight:~ 1`435 kg~ 1`644 kg
Load capacity:~ 624 kg~ 484 kg
Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 10 20015 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv