Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Kia Sportage 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 192 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 - 420 NM | 164 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 9.8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.3 | 5.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 12 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`059 | ~ 1`952 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |