Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-5
2017 -
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 155 - 194 HP136 - 306 HP
Torque: 196 - 420 NM320 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 10.9 seconds6.9 - 11.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8 - 7.25.3 - 10.7
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, a Mazda CX-5 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 193 mm (7.6 inches)230 mm (9.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.55 m4.64 m
Width: 1.84 m1.89 m
Height: 1.68 m1.71 m
Mazda CX-5 is smaller.
Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 506 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres1455 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 165 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`085~ 2`401
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 27 00016 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo XC60 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv