Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 - 194 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 7.2 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, a Mazda CX-5 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1455 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 165 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | ~ 2`401 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 27 000 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |