Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 - 194 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 5.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 7.2 | 2.0 - 7.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | ~ 2`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |