Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 1.5 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.4 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 193 mm (7.5 - 7.6 inches) | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1688 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`090 kg | ~ 2`208 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`567 kg | ~ 1`618 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 523 kg | ~ 590 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |