Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 193 mm (7.5 - 7.6 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 875 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1688 litres | 1982 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`090 kg | ~ 2`195 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`567 kg | ~ 1`571 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 523 kg | ~ 624 kg | |
| Mazda CX-5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |