Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 - 194 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 7.2 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5 2012. On average, Mazda CX-5 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2017 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |