Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 - 194 HP | 150 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 420 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 5.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 7.2 | 5.2 - 7.1 | |
|
Mazda CX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q5. On average, Mazda CX-5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`085 | ~ 2`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |